📋 Case Study
The Geysers Unit 16 ORC Augmentation – California, USA
Two-phase inlet flow causing expander cavitation; variable flow rates due to upstream steam turbine cycling; NEMA 4X enclosure requirement for coastal fog environment
🏗️ Project Overview
Addition of 3.2 MW transcritical ORC using R245fa to utilize 115°C two-phase geothermal effluent from existing dry-steam turbine condensate stream
🎯 Challenge
Two-phase inlet flow causing expander cavitation; variable flow rates due to upstream steam turbine cycling; NEMA 4X enclosure requirement for coastal fog environment
🔧 Design Approach
Vapor-liquid separator + flash drum upstream of expander; variable-speed axial turbine with anti-cavitation blade profile; stainless-clad NEMA 4X enclosure with desiccant air purge
📐 Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
📐 Key Calculations
Flash Vapor Fraction
x = (h_in − h_f) / (h_g − h_f)
Result: 0.38
Dictated separator sizing and vapor feed rate to expander
Cavitation Number
σ = (P_in − P_vap) / (0.5·ρ·V²)
Result: 1.82
Confirmed safe operation above critical threshold of 1.2
📊 Results
Achieved 13.1% net efficiency across 60–100% load range; zero cavitation events in 36-month operation; 98.7% availability factor💡 Lessons Learned
- •Two-phase separation is non-negotiable for reliable ORC augmentation
- •Cavitation number must be recalculated at every load point—not just design point
- •Desiccant purge extended electronics service life by 3× in high-humidity environments
✅ Key Takeaways
- 1Two-phase separation is non-negotiable for reliable ORC augmentation
- 2Cavitation number must be recalculated at every load point—not just design point
- 3Desiccant purge extended electronics service life by 3× in high-humidity environments