π Case Study
New York Con Edison Brooklyn Microgrid Demonstration
Legacy grid infrastructure unable to absorb distributed solar exports; required bi-directional active power curtailment and dynamic export limits
ποΈ Project Overview
Mixed-use urban block (22 buildings, 8.3 MW peak) with solar PV, BESS, and EV charging aggregation
π― Challenge
Legacy grid infrastructure unable to absorb distributed solar exports; required bi-directional active power curtailment and dynamic export limits
π§ Design Approach
Peer-to-peer transactive energy layer using blockchain-secured settlement + IEEE 2030.5 DERMS with adaptive export cap algorithm
π Design Diagram
AI-generated project design illustration
π Key Calculations
Dynamic Export Cap
Cap = f(Voltage Profile, Line Loading, Transformer Temp)
Result: 1.2β3.8 MW
Prevents reverse power flow violations
Transactive Settlement Latency
Block Time + Consensus + Settlement
Result: 2.3 sec
Meets NYISO 5-sec dispatch requirement
π Results
Achieved 99.4% export compliance rate; reduced local transformer loading by 31%; enabled 100% solar self-consumption during peak hoursπ‘ Lessons Learned
- β’Transactive layers require deterministic consensusβnot probabilistic PoW
- β’Export cap algorithms must ingest real-time transformer hotspot data
β Key Takeaways
- 1Transactive layers require deterministic consensusβnot probabilistic PoW
- 2Export cap algorithms must ingest real-time transformer hotspot data